15. the dream that got me killed

1. in the Uk a law exists that compels everyone to compensate for any detriments through illness a disabled person may have to make sure they can participate in society on an equal footing, as demonstrated  in the drawing;

;
     1.1.In Netherlands we do not have that law, nor that right  . Instead mostly courts and authorities easily revert to abusing our detriments through illness and our dependence on the government  to show us who is boss, usualy with the fatal consequences intended, 

2. So based on what all was done to me I have  made the following recommendations;

1/ money talks
one of the detriments disabled and elderly people have through illness or old age is that we usually do
not have a job, while damages for wrongdoing are usually calculated based on loss of income, that we do not have.
While damage done to people who already are vulnerable, especially through violation of their human rights, will have a huge impact on our lives  as well.
My suggestion would therefor be to set a minimum fixed amount to be paid in compensation per
violation per human right per count or month, to compensate for that detriment and also to hopefully act as an incentive for the judicial system to be more careful with our lives and human rights, that now are worth nothing,
As usually our human rights are violated in clusters, that method would also give a better impression of what was actually done, by the total sum thus calculated.

2/ power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
While english judges per the law quoted above make every effeort to find out what it is that drove a disabled person to go to court , ours do everything they can to keep us out of their courtrooms and how they despise us often even rings through in their doings and verdicts .
Because we are too ill to go through endless appeals why can we not get verdicts anulled where we are insulted or discriminated against? and compensated for regardless.
And why  are not terms set  for treatment of all appeals so courts cannot drag proceedings until we have succumbed to the damage we are appealing? 
I would suggest we just get 5000 euros for insulting verdicts or  any decision based on discrimination or where we are not taken seriously , as well as 5000 for any decision that is overdue . 

C/ criminal precedes cripple
to change the attitude towards the Dutch disabled, similar rights and principles should apply for us as now apply for defendants . For them our freedom  is at stake, but for us, our lives are 

•  just like them we should be entitled to verdicts within set terms  

•  just like defendants   cannot get the death penalty in Netherlands, we should also no longer be executed  under any pretense beit some rule, undue delay or  accusation 

•  Just like defendants are not considered guilty and punished unless proven in court, we should also be regarded to not be at fault  and punished until after a complete  courtrun , because the way things are now based on the siliest of accusations  our rights can be terminated and once the damage is thus done, judges will not be willing to confirm wrongdoing

In this respect we should be allowed to also request anullment of any verdict where a case is not treated contentwise or where our statements are redefined, and get compensated

• We should also be automatically granted lawyers for every case, even the ones regarded simple or redundant by third parties, because many of us indeed cannot appeal and the few who dare try are trampled upon and disrespected by the legal system , while it is also too stressful for disabled people, given their physcial limitations.We need lawyers to defend us, to tell us our rights and help us avoid pitfalls and traps set by seasoned lawyers turned judges, who in Netherlands were professionally trained to attack and bash victims to defend their criminal clients.
  

Lawyers themselves will then be assured to get paid, unlike now, where 5 Dutch human rights lawyers refused to even hear my case, let alone help me bring it before your court,for fear of not getting paid.

•  psychiatrists may not be used to suggest evidence when that is lacking for defendants, similarly we should be allowed to refuse any psychological  test in case of any conflict or any running of an , even unrelated, appeal, without consequences for the outcome of any proceedings. It is too easy to  abuse  our obligation to provide information for assessment of our claims
  

• like defendants can have their case concluded in another jurisdiction,  so should everyone else,  for any reason, especially when they are  to be judged in an area that is hostile to them or if they land in backwaters

• when perps commit a bunch of crimes simultaneously they get a discount on their sentence, though that is maybe not the best of comparison, in case of disabled people authorities should be disallowed to heap up damage by detrimental measures until the first and/or primary one has  been concluded in court . We should get discount on suffering as well  to prevent compound damage  will casuse irrepairable and/or fatal issues.

ART 13,  EVERYONE  IS  ENTITLED  TO  AN  EFFECTIVE  MEASURE

•  defendants are sometimes found to be unfit medically to stand trial and spared that hassle, how can the same issue of ill health that warrants humanity for defendants warrant the epiphany of inhumanity in disabled people ?
•  
  

Look what all the legal system did to me,! How it tortured me to death and mafe me suffer  in every detail of my life every minue of every day and night for 5 years without end.
Look what all hassle I had and have to  endure to even try stay alive, alone, continuously in the face
of death, without any help, fulltime.The Ducth may argue disabled people are living on state money, while in fact we live on tax payers money, but so do defendants.

4. I am not saying our government did not make good laws to comply with international obligations , but it also appoints judges and authorities that used to be lawyers attacking victims to defend their clients , and they replace those rules with their prejudice that we are stupid, smoochers and cons, so  we need to be protected from those prejudices and people, to get fair treatment  and fair trials.     
     4.1. To just give an impression how our lives are valued by Dutch courts, from a different angle;
 A while ago a disabled person was beaten to death in Holland and the judge let the perp go because he decided it could not be determined to what extent the pre existing illness contributed to the demise of the victim, while even in developing countries judges tend to make it clear to such perpetrators that anyone attacking a disabled person  takes a bigger risk and is responsible for whatever consequences.

14, nothing has changed

The wolfpack

1. People wil find it very very hard to believe that in Netherlands almost an entire country of crazed murderers is hunting down a single disabled old lady and treat her as if she is state enemy number 1 , while  all she did was  write to the European court of human rights to try better the position of the Dutch disabled,

1. Yet if we accept the findings by Prod Tak, that  no citizen stands a chance, which is the title of his book,  and that Dutch courts  strive to never aknowledge wrongdoing by the state and its multinationals , there is no way around the fact that they are the friend of wrongdoers and the enemy of people seeking justice, or see such people as their enemy  even.

3. If you think this finding through that means that every attempt an applicant makes to try better the situation , only creates a bigger posse and makes things worse, because each party tried is not  goind to admit to any previous wrongdoing, and in doing so does wrong itself.
So with every new attempt another  set of domino stones will tumble and that set of stones will in turn cause their circle to fall,  and join the posse , and so on and so forth

3.1. And every party that is engaged in the murder from then on gets an interest in it to succeed becasue they did wrong, even while no one will ever aknowledge it, or because they just like murdering when knowing it can be done free of charges 

4. If we think this through this means that even when officials commit crimes like looting torturing or murder, because no one  is allowed to aknowledge that, no one can help.
That is why the citizen does not stand a chance with a corrupted legal system as the Dutch one as far as you can call it a legal system
And that is why Netherlands is not so much a country where these things could never happen, it is in fact precisley the only one country where these things  can  and do happen, A lot.

5. Which means that nothing has changed as what my case shows  is that  just like 80 years ago only 1 psychopathic murderer suffices to turn an entire legal system, all government organisations and all BSN members to a looting and murdering mob, None of them even makes an attempt for doing justice, they lie through their teeth to create a reality  of nothing the matter,  and an image of an idiot,  that coud not be frther from the truth and the facts as my life was completely ruined by illegal acts
     5.1. few people know that of all countries in Europe the Netherlands rendered up the most jews to their Nazi killers, because our courts and  government organisations from day 1 enthousaistically  collaborated with the Nazis, It were Dutch courts that looted these people who had nowhere to go from everything they could have saved their lives with, just like they did me. It so seems they are still up to their old tricks, and nothing has changed, And nothing ever will 

6. Just imagine how scared I  am of  that huge posse of homicidal maniacs hunting down a cripple whose death they have already caused to murder her so their crimes and collaboration, AGAIN, can be kept a secret and made to disappear, but above all  they all make sure none of them has to ever pay a dime for all the wrong they did.
As for the Dutch when push coes to shove, that is all that counts

12a.. addition to last murder, definiton of depravity

The epiphany of depravity 
the double Dutch human rights judge

1. Not only did I ask to please be registered in my chapel, I further bared my sould expressing my heartfelt desire to write a childrens book about my travels

2. Because  I am the only and first single white lady who travelled Asian countries that do not provide facilities for disabled people , like India, Thailand and Malaysia, alone with my wheelchair,  I would like to show disabled children the world is theirs  as well , though maybe not so much in Netherlands .

3. The pictures were drawn by my Indian friend, yes, I have friends all over the world,  She made them already 2 years ago but with the ongoingly having to fight for my life, I never got round to  writing

3.1. I am really proud of my travels  that I very very much enjoyed .In  all countries I met so many nice people, had such special food, saw such beautiful things and fed the cats and the pigeons everywhere I went, because  being on the run, you cannot have one of your own

4. But it is never a good idea to express your heartfelt desire or talk about something special you did, because in people who have nothing but hatred it will instill the desire to put you down even more. Because if you hate a person so much you want to kill her, you must make that person look bad, and cannot allow her to fulfill any potential  as they want everyone to hate you too.

5. Usually verdicts are used to make you look an idiot  who is bothering courts over nothing  ,  as usually other than those verdicts in case someone is not an idiot that is all you have to paint that picture. Those verdicts are therefor almost always an intrinsic part of every  lynching attempt

6. I do not file appeals any more as they are merely used as leverage to make things worse for me, but last year I had filed my second one  with the supreme court. That was dealt with behind my back in a heartbeat, going behind your back being THE hallmark of  MY KILLER  as is the cruelty in the letter he knowingly had send to the wrong address , his hallmark as well, where he sort of gloats in anticipation of the punishment I would receive for not reacting on time,while knowing full well the letter would not  not reach me, as he used a different address than the one on file.
But I did not care too much as I had already learned  with him on board the Supreme Court,  any appeal there is money wasted and this way al least he trashed the case for free, while otherwise he charges 149 euros for that, So just as well.
  
7.  To my surprise that same case that had already been  officially dismissed, was put back on track as I was asked to pay the courtfee again,  which I did not do assuming this was another  trick to further fleece me, 
     7.1. Next I was asked to provide  further detail to the appeal that as I recall it consisted of just one letter, which I also did not do. Because  either one of these neglects on my part will ALWAYS lead to the case being dismissed and that seemed the best solution.
     7.2 Both these requests were send to the proper address.

8.  But  this case was not dismissed. It was scheduled for verdict ! which notification was send to the wrong address again. I guess because no other appeals were up and running  while MY KILLER had the urge to lash out again , he sort of recycled this  already dismissed  one. 
and caused the verdict on the dismissed but recycled one, alledged to have been given by another northerner , coincide with the verdict by the northern judge in the bribed lawyers case  as timing in these wolfpack attacks is of the essence  to shock the victim and make it inapt to properly react  

9. No one could pull this off but someone currently employed in the Dutch supreme court , so my deduction based on profiling appears to have been accurate . MY KILLER  per his village roots has obviously been networking
He is also the only one in a position and with the drive to bring the village lynching that in the north is regarded justice, to the level of a state lynching  and myself with that to the position of state enemy number 1.  which means I have noit just lost my house and stuff, and my life, but als my home country as nothing honest or fair will ever go down there in regards to me , ever again

12. last murder

1.   As explained HERE, murders in the Netherlands at least in the rural north of the country  are committed by the legal system , authorities and any third party that could be of service , who attack as a wolfpack all things that are essential for survival   to in a SEEMINGLY  legal way intentionally cause the following 

• infliction of massive financial damage, to lead to  home eviction,  to thus indirectly cause termination of state income and of right to healthcare as well as other rights, such as the right to act in court

• if income cannot be taken  indirectly, as a consequence of the  eviction, it is taken directly, in a SEEMINGLY legal way, by some or other accustation, and that also goes for right to healthcare that, if everything else fails,  is simply just stopped, while  appeals, if at all possible are simply not treated or messed with

• to make the target appear deserving of all that it is trashed  to  also be more easily discarded  as in shot by police , to be presented as a suicide by the courts  that gave the verdict the target was trashed in to -explain- the pretended suicide and alibi the murder

1.1. The  plots are always designed to succeed fast and to efficiently cause the death of the target  yet if it would survive for a bit  more damage added in the loopholes of the law will eventually lead to he desired result , after which , all files are thrown away,  so who cares?

2.  Normally murders are committed via  illegally inflicted financial damage, usually through taxes,   to lead to home eviction, to lead to death, because  in  Netherlands  loss of residence automatically leads to loss of entitlement to everything needed to survive as all that depends on the residence, such as the right to healthcare , to disability pension  to any insurance and to most of our civil rights such as the right to vote and the right to act in court, so people who land on the streets are left no alternative but to die a horrible death of exhaustion and exposure , as a result of illegal measures they cannot appeal, but who cares.
      2.2  . home eviction has been attempted to be caused by northern courts ongoingly in retaliation for my attempt to better the legal position of the Dutch disabled with help of the european court of human rights,  based on a decision of one of their own,  that denied me minimal household help as an officially confirmed  wheelchairdependant lady,

3.  But I managed to speedsell my house far below value to not get executed and fled abroad hoping to escape the murderous rampage of the the corrupted, pretended legal system of the north and northerners in other courts , 
Though, when abroad,  normally other courts become competent,  northern courts unfortunately do not care about the law other than as a tool and still seize my cases  to continue the murderous rampage.  
      3.1. Because  northern  rural people  use the law as a tool to commit crimes  to make them APPEAR legal acts, the leader of the posse ,  my murderer,   identified HERE   created civil case  nr  nr  7152444 CV EXPL 18 47 28  where he uses his new bf the bribed lawyer , also a northerner, again as a proxy  to file for payment in the ING case, to make the murder APPEAR a legal act,  per his tradition as  a northerner, 

4.   THIS   is the letter where my legal insurance confirms its agreement  with the lawyer to pay his fees up till 30.000 euros, which makes them the party that has to pay , not me. Even if they would refuse, which is not  the case as you can see here,  but even if that were so,  the legal insurance  is the one to be sued, not myself.
        4.1.  But because they want to murder me, and not my insurance to make me APPEAR the one to pay the judge ordered the insurance to write a letter they would not pay , though in a true legal sense that does not change the fact the lawyer still has to sue them  .  But once the kill has been completed, who cares about such details ? or the law? 
 
 5. THIS  is a letter from Amsterdam court , that confirms that regarding the case the lawyer claims payment for,   he just wrote ONE letter, the court adds copy of,   that I forbade him to send as I knew it would make me loose the case . Based on his hourly fee that would entitle him to 1000 euros maximum to be claimed with my insurance.
But that amount cannot kill me, so he claims 16.000 not based on what he worked but on what he wants to loot, which is my chapel house,   and would have already looted behind my back  based on no contest verdict .  As who would have cared ? 

 6. To make  Assen court that ALWAYS rules in favor of its ethnic peers APPEAR competent, the local council delayed my deregistration from the sold house, that is normally processed in 2-5 days with 2 months to enable the lawyer to file at the officially registered address, though he himself forced me to sell that house and everyone knew I no longer lived there. 
      6.1. This way in a legal sense I was kept in te country  while the lawyer going behind my back could obtain a vericht granting his false claim based on no contest. 
      6.2. This looting and murdering behind your back is normal in that area as this attack in essence is  the same as the one described  HERE , mostly in att 22,  of that case, which attack was also designed and led by  the person who designs and organises the killings  , described in detail  HERE ,  in whose MO going behind your back is the most prominent feature  ;

7. Normal people communicate, also in case of any issue,  to try resolve it, they do not say nothing to behind the back of the other party file a lawsuit. 
       7.1. and though normally the relationship between a lawyer and his client is utterly confidential and special, the lawyers law even legally oblige parties to communicate between them in case of an issue, while all kinds of mediation practices are installed  to help out in case that does not work        
       7.2.   But because this is not about the law, not even about the money because my insurance is good for that, but about the killing and the looting  the lawyer took every precaution to NOT alert me to anything going on and never contacted me AT ALL , to not endanger  his true aim
      7.3. and for that same reason , he simply disregards his   legal obligation to treat my complaints  himself first and he also refuses to answer any questions posed through the deacon’s office, because if you are in a hurry to catch up with someone trying to escape you cannot busy yourself with legal obligations as they would cause delay, that could prove fatal to reaching the goal of murder, You merely use it as a tool and pretense and that is it.


8. abnormality also defines every detail of the courts doings

•   the court takes every effort to make the supina that was wronlgly delivered APPEAR a valid one,  and itself APPEAR the competent court, by writing my new and old address  in their letters, which does not change the fact the supina was not deliovered to both addresses but to the wrong address  

• 8.1. Normally when requested,  people supina-d ALWAYS  get a stay to prepare a defense , regardles for what trifling reason it is asked, but I was refused one 
•     while I had not even seen the supina 
•     and provided proof of consussion and mutiple tooth abscess 

  It is  by the way  common practice in the north that where normal people pause,  northerners  push on when someone is in bad shape because they do not intend anything legal,  but crimes and the damage inflicted by  those crimes is more devastating  when someone is defenseless, to add to the pleasure of the snuff parties 

• • Only after I made a lot of fuss, eventually a 10 day stay was granted, but the possibility to react was in fact  blocked, because,  though everyone is allowed reactions per  fax, I was ordered to send a letter, as you can see here which is not EVER done anywhere in Netherlands, 
  and they knew I had to send it  from Australia , that takes 2-3 weeks to arrive,  not 10 days.
•  
  Of which 10 days pretended stay  5 were taken off  in advance by demand my letter had to be in 3 days for the hearing which included a weekend , so 5 days , while normally 1 day prior suffices even in big and  busy courts, 
  and while normally for people staying abroad per art 6,13, 14 and 17 EVRM automatically longer terms are allowed, while here instead that  stay abroad is (and further will be) exploited by the judge to the benefit of claimant

• 8.2.  To press on the soonest  my request for stay was redefined to - a reaction-  while I had not even seen the supina,    and the judge  announced she would proceed to give verdict,

•  8.3.   I was also not allowed  a copy of that judge-s decision, that is normally automatically provided,  as likely the killer judge wants to remain anonymous, to prevent any legal action and ensuing delay from  my side as well

•   8.4.   And gain,   before I  even attempted to give a reaction the verdict is announced in advance,   so the regular 2 reactions per person are skipped as well to  demonstrate the fact the judge could not care less about what I may have to say  as the verdict is already determined on before I even saw the supina, that the registrar already knows will thus upset me  she advises me to not show up at the hearing

     8.5. This all is basically done because my murderer , one of the highest legal people in the country ,is so possessed and fired up to make sure that this time I will not escape, that  he cannot allow anything justice or legal  to stand in his path   
      8.6   No doubt while the verdict is on its way to Australia for the duration of 3 weeks  SEEMINGLY legal the lawyer will loot all he likes behind my back  and simply stick to plan A, while as is already happening the court refuses to dens me a copy of the verdict and when I call the court hangs up the phone
      8.7. To summarise the above;

 to make the murder appear a legal act  a courtcase is crafted  ( normally I would have paid just to be rid of them) to use as a pretense ,  with a false claim,  filed at the wrong address, in the wrong court, to the wrong person, on a fake bill, but all of that  does not matter because I cannot escape this one as there is no help anywhere and no one does his job
 
9.   So now we have covered  the looting of my house and bankaccount, but that would still leave me in possession of my disability pension, the termination of which  is however the real aim of it all here, and that is secured as follows
      9.1. Though nothing in any country is more sacred than a lawyers oath thos one produces a  load of emails that he  claims are written by me, that do not even remotely relate to his claim, and even if they would, still that would be  a flagrant violation of his oath,  to serve the goal of giving the FALSE impression I have lived abroad for many years , which  will be used as an excuse to terminate my income , and given the fact my apppeals will not be treated ,  any pretense will sufice .
In the north it is normal prcatice to use lawyers to  get to their pretended clients
      9.2. The bribed proxy  made similar statements in the Amsterdam civil case against ING, where they were also irrelevant , which case as explained HERE  petered out and was not verdicted on , so the intended goal  was not achieved at that time,
       9.3. Aftre that  my income was attempted to be terminated by a so called investigation on pretenses that had to be aborted august 6th because I had fled abroad, and on that very date  august 6th the supina was filed with included the next attempt for my income  by means of this illegal method ,  so the third one in just 2 months, but no one cares about me , my rights or my life
         9.4.  So that is how in the human rightest country judges and legal people make it APPEAR a legal act  to finish off the crippled and elderly , looting them for all they are worth and then discarding of them in a ditch to let them rot and die a horribly cruel death  as for practical rurals it is the result that counts  and they know that no one cares  
          
10.   I do not owe the lawyer even one dime, and could have proven his claim a false one, in every detail a o all the phone calls he claims 3000 euros for can easily be proven to not have bean made, but nevertless,  just to be left alone by and  be spared from the utter vileness and sadistic cruelty of northern courts I offered to pay the outrageous and ridiculous amount of 16.000 euros  
The offer was not reacted to as this is not about the law or justice or even the payment it is about hatred, revenge and murder, which is the basis and cause for 87% of pretended legal doings in the north to some or other degree,  that are made to  APPEAR  legal, through charades, gossip manipulation of people and files and fraud  

 11. That this case in not even the smallest of details resembles a courtcase is because it is not one, 
That this case in every detail bears  ALL the hallmarks of a DUTCH STYLE LYNCHING aka a hatecrime , in abundance, is because that is what this is.
      11,1, A dutch style lynching ( Dutch word; volksgericht)  is a medieval perverted brand of vigilante justice , that is a  cherished tradition  in the north, where a community hysterically acts out some or other emotion on a defenseless victim for anything that upsets them ( a lot upsets people who hate you)  but is not a punishable act in itself, The wikipedia explanation and definition can be viewed HERE.
the hallmarks of such doings are;

•     going behind the back of the victim ( 6  and 9)
•     doings only SEEM legal at first shight but upon closer examination they are in fact Illegal or not legal at all. (4, 7, 9  and 10)
•     the victim has no rights whatsoever, not to a defense not to call experts or gather proof, like myself ( 9)
•     and  the verdict is decided upon inadvance   while people files facts and minutes are manipulated  and situations exploited to make the intended  verdict seem the legally right one.(9 and 10)

12. as explained on wikipedia and shown above this courtcase is a charade that serves to distract third parties and provide a SEEMINGLY legal  justication for commission of  vulgar crimes  that are  the real intent of the wrought charade to begin with
     12.1. I claimed to be victim of a lynching already in 2016 with the european court of human rights but my request for intervention and my life were shreddered. 

14. The killer closely follows the standard murder script as detailed above under 1, and we have now covered the termination of healthcare , the looting of my house, of my stuff, that he for some reason is very much after, the taking of my income, so that still leaves the trashing to be taken care of to coincide with a devastating verdict,  

• 14.1. That  was attempted through recyckling of an appeal that had already been discraded as described here, and when I managed to prevent the verdict to be given by another northerner, in the supreme court that to me confirms my  PROFILE  was right on the mark,, also because none other than  HIM  could  and would have made so many legal people act against the law and join his posse to murder an already dying cripple 
• 14.2 the very day after that taxes  accused me of aggression when I invoked my right to live and to not be treated creulley and inhumanly as that obligatory invocation was aken as an insult, or better word, pretense to trash me 

 17, This all was crafted and organised by a former human rights judge one of he highest legal people in the country yet hauling from the rural north  doing his village things where ever he lands 

    

 

11. Europe Court of Human Rights, part 4

This appeal was filed  with the Euopean court of human rights, when home eviction was illegally attempted by ING in the course of Amsterdam proceedings, where government authorities  joined forces  and played a prominent part, which part was here appealed .

The appeal was thrown out , again by Eicke, (or his stamp) whose job it is to check if appeals meet with formal requirements.

Listed are ; 

1. THE VERDICT APPEALED
pls scroll down to english text with thin and bold print

2. APPEAL TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, JUNE 19 2018

3.  I send THIS letter to the European court, through their website nov 15th  2018, when the last attempt to murder me was ongoing, 

4. and in retaliation, that very same day Eicke, or his stamp,  DISMISSED  this appeal, 
so basically on behalf of the human rights court, kicked a dying criple, begging for her life, in the gut , 
so basically applying the same MO as is displayed in THIS DECISION . the very one that is appealed

Which is why I feel it is possible Eicke's  stamp did it, or a former staffmember who is loyal to his or her former boss; Eicke is  friend and former close collegue of J Silvis , attorney general in Dutch supreme court, who used to work in the same department with Eicke, when Silvis  was a judge in the human rights court

10. European court of human rights part 3

Third appeal to the european court of human rights  regarded 

1. unequeal treatment, 
discrimination by authorities of disabled people that are treated with disrespect and their requests dismissed or ignored
Taxes went as far as to abuse  my disability by making demands I could not physically meet with, to then financially punish me for that failure, which I claimed is cruel treatment

2. taxes and courts  refusal to  disclose decisions and provide copies of relevant documents, which is their legal duty

3.   This was done to prevent appeals to proceed to impounding without the delay appeals woud have caused , which impounding was also tried to be managed behind my back.
The debt was based on  retroactive recall of refunded mortgage interest  over 2010 till 2012 regardless of the fact a judge had already ruled  those illegal. Here are  listed the decisions  appealed;
 

1. DECISION BY NATIONALE OMBUDSMAN 
and analysis of that decision, that I felt was based on discrimination

Nationale Ombudsman went so far as to substitute a letter written by one of their  investigators by the substitue ombudsman to iron out all mistakes , but as my analysis shows it is still discriminatory

information regarding normal policy in regards to use of postal address


  2.  DECISION BY TAXES 
legally allowed time to decide; 10 weeks, time taken; 2 year. 

       list of documents that courts and taxes refuse to provide copies of, till date
at the bottom 2 letters are listed that Taxes denies exist.

       proof of impounding of faked debts
       along with details of a Dutch style lynching  
that consists of a  complex financial and legalistic attack, with aim to kill in the loopholes of the law;
mark the amount to be left available to me as calculated by taxes ( 500 something) and as calculated by a private  company ( 800 something) based on the SAME details and laws. 

 
2.   APPEAL TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS  APRIL 6   2018 
I also appealed here that taxes could not be reached from abroad  by fax and post was disregarded when not in after 10 days, while post from abroad takes 2 weeks to arrive.
This disadvantage to people abroad  was compensated for after this appeal, though the appeal was dismissed dismissed.


  3.  ANOTHER QUICK REJECTION BY TIM EICKE
this is a rather over the top reaction because all reasons for disqualification are mentioned, while none of these applied .
I  do not believe Eicke meant to imply that making decisions, but not sending them and not treating appeals , but impound also behind the back of the citizen is fair, I guess he meant to express his loyalty to  his friend , whom he used to work together with, in that department, maybe the friend helped him formulate the verdict

8. European Court of Human Rights, part 1

  

click the link below to see how  

MY  FIRST REQUEST TO  PROTECT  MY  LIFE  WAS SHREDDERED

7. the European Court of Human Rights and ING bank

Per the CODE that imposes a duty to care on any bank, among other things banks have to make sure before granting a mortgage loan that the receiver will be able to pay all installments in full for the duration of the loan.

BUT
ING easily forgets about the CODE when it can make a profit, like when an old and./.or disabled single lady needs a 100,000 euro loan on a house with value of 250.000, 
In that case ING grants a loan where the reciver must pay 546 a month on a spendable income of 525, to on the first sign of foreseeable financial difficulty , seize the hpouse on pretense of being in falut with payments to sell it underhandedly , to not just get the loan back, but make a huge profit as well. 

all links will open documents in a new window ;

1. this link shows the  FINANCIAL PART
the 900 a month income is frauded in because I never had that

2, and this link will show how Mr Galama , Eemnes, won the case for ING by changing my request from;
-GIVE  ME  25.000  EUROS-
to
- do not give my client ANY money, make her pay back the loan and as much else as possible -



3. because I am LEGALLY ALLOWED SELF REPRESENTATION IF THE CLAIM IS LESS THAN  25000,- EUROS
 

4. I FIRED THE OBVIOUSLY BRIBED LAWYER


5. and  CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STATE MY OWN CASE   IN COURT, as that was legally mine

6, when judge de Waal , nicknamed ING friend, refused to oblige, because he had no need for cats or truth; as the  bribed lawyers letter was all he needed to make ING win the case

• I urged the lawyer to withdraw  the letter, which he refused, which is odd

• I urged the deacon of the lawyer to make Galama withdraw the letter, which request was ignored

• I asked the judge for a stay to find another lawyer, which request was ignored

• and asked the courts supervisors to give me another judge, which request was denied.

7. I then filed a REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION in the European court of human rights, asking to  protect my right to be heard in a fair trial, that was also ignored, till date

8; proof that request was faxed

Conclusion;
ING is very well connected in legal circles and its corruption goes all the way up , all the way 
And corrupted legal people do as they like and no one minds the rights or the interest of the applicant