Third appeal to the european court of human rights regarded
1. unequeal treatment,
discrimination by authorities of disabled people that are treated with disrespect and their requests dismissed or ignored
Taxes went as far as to abuse my disability by making demands I could not physically meet with, to then financially punish me for that failure, which I claimed is cruel treatment
2. taxes and courts refusal to disclose decisions and provide copies of relevant documents, which is their legal duty
3. This was done to prevent appeals to proceed to impounding without the delay appeals woud have caused , which impounding was also tried to be managed behind my back.
The debt was based on retroactive recall of refunded mortgage interest over 2010 till 2012 regardless of the fact a judge had already ruled those illegal. Here are listed the decisions appealed;
1. DECISION BY NATIONALE OMBUDSMAN
and analysis of that decision, that I felt was based on discrimination
Nationale Ombudsman went so far as to substitute a letter written by one of their investigators by the substitue ombudsman to iron out all mistakes , but as my analysis shows it is still discriminatory
information regarding normal policy in regards to use of postal address
2. DECISION BY TAXES
legally allowed time to decide; 10 weeks, time taken; 2 year.
list of documents that courts and taxes refuse to provide copies of, till date
at the bottom 2 letters are listed that Taxes denies exist.
proof of impounding of faked debts
along with details of a Dutch style lynching
that consists of a complex financial and legalistic attack, with aim to kill in the loopholes of the law;
mark the amount to be left available to me as calculated by taxes ( 500 something) and as calculated by a private company ( 800 something) based on the SAME details and laws.
2. APPEAL TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS APRIL 6 2018
I also appealed here that taxes could not be reached from abroad by fax and post was disregarded when not in after 10 days, while post from abroad takes 2 weeks to arrive.
This disadvantage to people abroad was compensated for after this appeal, though the appeal was dismissed dismissed.
3. ANOTHER QUICK REJECTION BY TIM EICKE
this is a rather over the top reaction because all reasons for disqualification are mentioned, while none of these applied .
I do not believe Eicke meant to imply that making decisions, but not sending them and not treating appeals , but impound also behind the back of the citizen is fair, I guess he meant to express his loyalty to his friend , whom he used to work together with, in that department, maybe the friend helped him formulate the verdict
1. unequeal treatment,
discrimination by authorities of disabled people that are treated with disrespect and their requests dismissed or ignored
Taxes went as far as to abuse my disability by making demands I could not physically meet with, to then financially punish me for that failure, which I claimed is cruel treatment
2. taxes and courts refusal to disclose decisions and provide copies of relevant documents, which is their legal duty
3. This was done to prevent appeals to proceed to impounding without the delay appeals woud have caused , which impounding was also tried to be managed behind my back.
The debt was based on retroactive recall of refunded mortgage interest over 2010 till 2012 regardless of the fact a judge had already ruled those illegal. Here are listed the decisions appealed;
1. DECISION BY NATIONALE OMBUDSMAN
and analysis of that decision, that I felt was based on discrimination
Nationale Ombudsman went so far as to substitute a letter written by one of their investigators by the substitue ombudsman to iron out all mistakes , but as my analysis shows it is still discriminatory
information regarding normal policy in regards to use of postal address
2. DECISION BY TAXES
legally allowed time to decide; 10 weeks, time taken; 2 year.
list of documents that courts and taxes refuse to provide copies of, till date
at the bottom 2 letters are listed that Taxes denies exist.
proof of impounding of faked debts
along with details of a Dutch style lynching
that consists of a complex financial and legalistic attack, with aim to kill in the loopholes of the law;
mark the amount to be left available to me as calculated by taxes ( 500 something) and as calculated by a private company ( 800 something) based on the SAME details and laws.
2. APPEAL TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS APRIL 6 2018
I also appealed here that taxes could not be reached from abroad by fax and post was disregarded when not in after 10 days, while post from abroad takes 2 weeks to arrive.
This disadvantage to people abroad was compensated for after this appeal, though the appeal was dismissed dismissed.
3. ANOTHER QUICK REJECTION BY TIM EICKE
this is a rather over the top reaction because all reasons for disqualification are mentioned, while none of these applied .
I do not believe Eicke meant to imply that making decisions, but not sending them and not treating appeals , but impound also behind the back of the citizen is fair, I guess he meant to express his loyalty to his friend , whom he used to work together with, in that department, maybe the friend helped him formulate the verdict
No comments:
Post a Comment