Per
the CODE that imposes a duty to care on any bank, among other things
banks have to make sure before granting a mortgage loan that the
receiver will be able to pay all installments in full for the duration
of the loan.
BUT
ING easily forgets about the CODE when it can make a profit, like when an old and./.or disabled single lady needs a 100,000 euro loan on a house with value of 250.000,
In that case ING grants a loan where the reciver must pay 546 a month on a spendable income of 525, to on the first sign of foreseeable financial difficulty , seize the hpouse on pretense of being in falut with payments to sell it underhandedly , to not just get the loan back, but make a huge profit as well.
all links will open documents in a new window ;
1. this link shows the FINANCIAL PART
the 900 a month income is frauded in because I never had that
2, and this link will show how Mr Galama , Eemnes, won the case for ING by changing my request from;
-GIVE ME 25.000 EUROS-
to
- do not give my client ANY money, make her pay back the loan and as much else as possible -
3. because I am LEGALLY ALLOWED SELF REPRESENTATION IF THE CLAIM IS LESS THAN 25000,- EUROS
4. I FIRED THE OBVIOUSLY BRIBED LAWYER
5. and CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STATE MY OWN CASE IN COURT, as that was legally mine
6, when judge de Waal , nicknamed ING friend, refused to oblige, because he had no need for cats or truth; as the bribed lawyers letter was all he needed to make ING win the case
7. I then filed a REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION in the European court of human rights, asking to protect my right to be heard in a fair trial, that was also ignored, till date
8; proof that request was faxed
Conclusion;
ING is very well connected in legal circles and its corruption goes all the way up , all the way
And corrupted legal people do as they like and no one minds the rights or the interest of the applicant
BUT
ING easily forgets about the CODE when it can make a profit, like when an old and./.or disabled single lady needs a 100,000 euro loan on a house with value of 250.000,
In that case ING grants a loan where the reciver must pay 546 a month on a spendable income of 525, to on the first sign of foreseeable financial difficulty , seize the hpouse on pretense of being in falut with payments to sell it underhandedly , to not just get the loan back, but make a huge profit as well.
all links will open documents in a new window ;
1. this link shows the FINANCIAL PART
the 900 a month income is frauded in because I never had that
2, and this link will show how Mr Galama , Eemnes, won the case for ING by changing my request from;
-GIVE ME 25.000 EUROS-
to
- do not give my client ANY money, make her pay back the loan and as much else as possible -
3. because I am LEGALLY ALLOWED SELF REPRESENTATION IF THE CLAIM IS LESS THAN 25000,- EUROS
4. I FIRED THE OBVIOUSLY BRIBED LAWYER
5. and CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STATE MY OWN CASE IN COURT, as that was legally mine
6, when judge de Waal , nicknamed ING friend, refused to oblige, because he had no need for cats or truth; as the bribed lawyers letter was all he needed to make ING win the case
- I urged the lawyer to withdraw the letter, which he refused, which is odd
- I urged the deacon of the lawyer to make Galama withdraw the letter, which request was ignored
- I asked the judge for a stay to find another lawyer, which request was ignored
- and asked the courts supervisors to give me another judge, which request was denied.
7. I then filed a REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION in the European court of human rights, asking to protect my right to be heard in a fair trial, that was also ignored, till date
8; proof that request was faxed
Conclusion;
ING is very well connected in legal circles and its corruption goes all the way up , all the way
And corrupted legal people do as they like and no one minds the rights or the interest of the applicant
No comments:
Post a Comment